Can I trust that my Geiger counter (GQ GMC 500) is in fact measuring radiation?

More
1 week 6 days ago #7311 by ChrisLX200
To put these low counts into perspective, I have watched quite a few YT vids of people exploring abandoned uranium mines. The background counts inside the mines were (to my mind) phenominal - like 50,000 CPM measured with a Radiacode RC103. Up close near the ore veins it could exceed 1,000,000 CPM! Miners used to work in those conditions. You would think they would all die within minutes at those levels but no, although not exactly healthy (and in years gone by some would suffer from cancers in later life) they were not dropping like flies. These levels are several orders of magnitude higher than anything you or I are likely to come across, even when handling our 'hottest' test sources. That's not to say you can be complacent about careful handling, especially alpha sources which may be ingested, but slight increases in background gamma activity are nothing to be concerned about. A gamma spectrometer in our case is used purely for academic interest to satisfy our curiosity. Professionals use very sensitive and expensive gamma spectrometers to measure things like food or land contamination but that kind of analysis is at another level.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 week 5 days ago #7313 by Simomax
Just to add to what ChrisLX200 said, there are very few places in the world where you would be able to a radioactive dose that would actually harm you in a short time. There are even less places you could go to like that, that are open to the public. The only places you could get a dose enough to harm you in a short time are nuclear material processing plants, specific labs and nuclear power plants. It always comes down to dose x time. The higher the dose and the longer the time, the greater outcome of harm. Once you get out of the instant or short time harm time frame you are getting into long time exposure, which generally will result in cancer, some time on from initial exposure. To become ill and start showing symptoms will take a tremendous dose of radiation in a short time, other than that it would, in many cases (unknowingly), cause cellular damage over the length of time exposed, and thus lead to DNA damage and cancer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 week 9 hours ago - 1 week 9 hours ago #7340 by Radman_L
Thanks for the replies. I'm more concerned about the long term exposure to radiation. There are a few 'hot spots' around the house where the CPM, and hence uSv/hr, levels have been for a few months 2-3 higher than the average measured levels for this area. The average levels for the city of Leiden are .08 uSv/hr or between 10-15 CPM and I have been measuring, lately, peaks around 40 CPM (this morning, for example, considerably higher). A device like the RadiaCode should help establish if I am indeed measuring radiation with my Geiger counter, what kind, and the levels.
Last edit: 1 week 9 hours ago by Radman_L.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 week 8 hours ago #7343 by Simomax
With only peaks at ~40cpm, getting a Radiacode would be a waste of money if all you were intending on using it to find out what the extra 25~30 cpm are. The counts are too low and the Radiacode will just pick up noise (NORM/cosmic rays etc). You would need to be in the hundreds of cpm and then leave the radiacode for several days to identify anything. The signal to noise level will simply be too low. If you are getting spots in your house with increased counts it is most likely radon and it's decay. A radon detector ( such as the Airthings Corentium ) may be a better choice. Obviously this will only let you know if Radon is present but will give you a clearer answer than the Radiacode with the low counts. You could also try doing a wipe test in various places of your house. Besides man made sources of radiation, Radon accounts for a good portion of the radiation on this planet, the other good chunk is NORM. The chances are it will be one of those two, or a mix thereof that you are finding. 

You are comparing counts inside your house to average levels. Where are you getting the average levels data? If this is public/government data then the readings will be taken outside. Radiation levels are generally always higher inside a building than outside. Also do you have any historic counter readings from these hot spots, or is that you have not long since got your GMC-500 and have recently noticed the ~40cpm? It would be handy to know if you have any historic readings, and also what is the cpm in the areas that are not hot?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 week 7 hours ago #7345 by ChrisLX200
Those levels are absolutely nothing to be concerned about and further analysis would be of purely academic interest only. As Simomax mentioned, a Radiacode is not sensitive enough and you would need a professional-level gamma scintilation detector with much higher efficiency to have any hope. At those detection levels the sample also has to be placed in a thick lead-lined chamber to exclude the very background activity you are seeing right now, and obviously you couldn't even do that. There are many other interesting things you can do with your detector, take it out with you on walks and check local rock formations for activity - you might be surprised, Also, wander around inside an antiques store and check out old glassware and pottery. Also old clocks and watches.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gamma-Man
Time to create page: 0.165 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
Everything's free. Please support us by considering a donation. Log in first!
Solar powered Raspberry Pi 4 server stats: CPU 38% Memory 12% Swap 15% CPU temp=62.8'C Uptime 12 Days